Bakkt announced on August 28, 2019 that its warehouse would begin offering secure storage of customer bitcoin on September 6, preparing the custody system required for the planned September 23 launch of its daily and monthly bitcoin futures.
The announcement converted another part of Bakkt’s launch plan into a dated operational milestone. The Intercontinental Exchange-backed venture was not merely proposing a contract whose final value would be paid in dollars. Its futures were designed for physical settlement: a seller carrying a contract through delivery would provide bitcoin, while the buyer would receive bitcoin through accounts maintained at the Bakkt Warehouse.
That distinction made custody integral to the product rather than an optional service attached to it. Bitcoin had to be deposited and recorded before the exchange could reliably process delivery obligations. Opening the warehouse on September 6 was therefore intended to give customers and clearing participants time to establish the custody arrangements needed before trading began.
One regulated chain from trading to delivery
ICE Futures U.S. had announced on August 16, 2019 that it expected to list the two contracts for the September 23 trade date. The exchange notice described both as physically settled contracts for bitcoin held in the Bakkt Warehouse and said they would clear through ICE Clear US. Each daily or monthly contract represented one bitcoin.
The institutional structure mattered as much as the settlement asset. ICE Futures U.S. was the regulated futures exchange, ICE Clear US was the registered derivatives clearing organization, and Bakkt Trust Company was the delivery warehouse and custodian. The arrangement was designed to place execution, clearing, custody and delivery inside a connected set of regulated entities.
A May 13, 2019 ICE Futures U.S. filing published by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission explained the mechanics in more detail. Market participants making or taking delivery would need warehouse accounts. Bitcoin deposited for delivery would be recorded on the public network as held by the warehouse, while customer ownership would be reflected on the warehouse’s internal books. Transfers used to settle futures would occur by book entry at the direction of the clearing house. The filing also said the warehouse could not use deposited bitcoin for its own purposes.
The filing was a self-certification by the exchange, not a CFTC endorsement of bitcoin or a guarantee that the contracts would attract liquidity. ICE’s August 16 notice stated that no further CFTC action was required after the May certification.
New York supplied the custody authority
The remaining custody foundation came from the New York State Department of Financial Services. On August 16, 2019, the department granted Bakkt Trust Company LLC a charter under New York Banking Law to operate as a limited liability trust company. DFS specifically authorized it to provide bitcoin custody in conjunction with physically delivered futures serving institutional customers.
That authorization narrowed an important operational gap. Cash-settled futures can reference a cryptocurrency price without requiring the clearing system to receive or safeguard cryptocurrency. Bakkt’s proposed delivery model instead required procedures for deposits, withdrawals, account records and settlement transfers involving bitcoin itself.
What the announcement did not establish
The August 28 statement set a custody start date; it did not demonstrate customer demand, trading volume or successful physical delivery. Those questions could only be answered after the warehouse and futures market began operating. It also did not establish that the September launches were immune from operational changes.
The contemporaneous record nevertheless shows why the milestone was significant. By August 28, Bakkt had identified dates for custody and trading, secured a New York trust charter, filed the contract framework and connected delivery to an established futures exchange and clearing house. For institutions evaluating bitcoin exposure, the proposal was an attempt to replace a patchwork of trading and custody relationships with one regulated market chain.
The complete source packet and revision history are retained with the newsroom record.
Automated systems may have assisted with source organization and drafting. Coinburn is accountable for the published text and maintains a revision record.
This article provides news and analysis, not investment, legal or tax advice. Digital assets are volatile and may result in total loss.