Bitcoin ended January 23, 2022 with a partial rebound, but the recovery did not undo the damage from a severe weekend selloff. CoinMarketCap’s historical end-of-day UTC snapshot placed bitcoin at $36,276.80, up 3.56% over 24 hours but down 15.86% over seven days. The combination mattered more than either percentage alone: buyers had stabilized the market for one session, while the weekly record still showed a decisive contraction in risk appetite.

The same snapshot valued bitcoin’s circulating supply at about $687.0 billion and recorded $26.0 billion in 24-hour volume. Those figures are aggregated market observations, not a single exchange’s executable quote. Cryptocurrency trades continuously, so “close” depends on the provider’s cutoff and methodology; CoinMarketCap describes its historical listings as end-of-UTC-day snapshots.

A bounce inside a larger break

Contemporaneous reporting captured the disorder before the later UTC snapshot. Reuters reported on January 23 that bitcoin had been quoted at $35,049 after falling as low as $34,000 during the weekend move. The report described bitcoin as roughly half of its approximately $69,000 November 2021 peak. That $35,049 figure and CoinMarketCap’s $36,276.80 snapshot are not contradictory closes: they reflect different observation times and, potentially, different venue aggregation.

Ether showed the same rebound-within-a-rout pattern. CoinMarketCap’s January 23 snapshot put ETH at $2,535.04, up 5.40% over 24 hours but down 24.35% over seven days. Solana’s SOL was $99.58, up 5.73% over 24 hours and down 32.65% over seven days. The broad positive 24-hour readings among major non-stablecoin assets therefore marked a pause after heavy losses, not evidence that the preceding week had been recovered.

The seven-day comparison is especially useful because crypto’s continuous trading can make a weekend snapshot look detached from the Friday close in traditional markets. It shows that the stress extended beyond bitcoin and into smart-contract assets with materially larger weekly percentage losses.

The macro clock was setting the tone

The institutional context on January 23 was a rapid repricing of monetary-policy risk. Reuters linked the cryptocurrency selloff to falling appetite for speculative assets, inflation concerns and expectations of a more aggressive Federal Reserve path. It also noted that the S&P 500 and Nasdaq had just recorded their largest weekly percentage declines since March 2020.

The Federal Reserve’s official calendar confirms that the Federal Open Market Committee was scheduled to meet on January 25–26, 2022. On January 23, the decision from that meeting was not yet known. The defensible event-day conclusion is therefore narrower than hindsight might suggest: traders were positioning ahead of a known policy meeting, while analysts attributed part of the simultaneous crypto and equity weakness to expectations about tighter financial conditions.

That distinction matters. The market data verify the repricing; they do not prove a single cause. Weekend liquidity, leverage reductions, technical selling and asset-specific factors could also have contributed, and the available contemporaneous records do not allocate the move among them.

What January 23 established

The selected development was market-structural rather than a new protocol rule, court judgment or regulatory order. Bitcoin’s end-of-day bounce coexisted with a 15.86% seven-day fall, while ether and solana remained down even more over the same window. The snapshot showed crypto trading as a high-volatility risk complex ahead of a major central-bank meeting, with a one-day recovery insufficient to reverse the week’s repricing.

The clean reading is not that the selloff had ended. It is that bitcoin traded in the mid-$30,000s at the cited January 23 observations while the weekly trend and macro uncertainty remained unresolved.

Primary sourceCoinMarketCap historical snapshot for January 23, 2022

The complete source packet and revision history are retained with the newsroom record.

Automated desk disclosure

Automated systems may have assisted with source organization and drafting. Coinburn is accountable for the published text and maintains a revision record.

Financial-risk note

This article provides news and analysis, not investment, legal or tax advice. Digital assets are volatile and may result in total loss.