Cboe Futures Exchange said on March 14, 2019 that it was not adding a new Cboe Bitcoin (USD) futures contract during March and did not then intend to list additional XBT contracts. The exchange said it was assessing how it planned to continue offering digital-asset derivatives.
The decision narrowed one of the most visible connections between bitcoin and the regulated U.S. derivatives market. It did not immediately close Cboe’s XBT market: contracts already listed remained available for trading, with the final listed maturity extending into June 2019.
What Cboe actually announced
Cboe’s product update, identified as Reference ID C2019031400, placed XBT under “No New Contracts.” Its language was deliberately provisional. Cboe said it was considering its next steps and did not “currently” intend to list more contracts. That was a suspension of new listings, not an announcement that every outstanding position had been canceled or that bitcoin futures were prohibited in the United States.
The distinction mattered for traders holding existing contracts. Those instruments could continue trading and settle under their established terms. Cboe’s original product certification defined XBT as a cash-settled future with a multiplier of one bitcoin. Final settlement was tied to the U.S.-dollar bitcoin auction price on Gemini rather than delivery of bitcoin itself.
Cboe therefore provided regulated price exposure without requiring futures participants to transfer or custody the underlying asset. The March 14 decision removed the mechanism for extending that particular contract series beyond its already listed maturities.
Why the retreat mattered
Cboe and CME had supplied two prominent U.S. exchange venues for bitcoin futures since December 2017. Their entry had been treated as an institutional milestone because futures could support hedging, bearish positioning and price discovery within established clearing and regulatory structures.
By March 2019, however, the two venues had not developed equally. Contemporaneous reporting described weaker activity in Cboe’s contract while CME continued listing its own bitcoin futures. Cboe’s decision consequently looked more like a venue-level commercial retreat than the disappearance of the regulated U.S. bitcoin-futures market.
That interpretation should remain qualified. Cboe’s notice did not disclose a volume threshold, revenue calculation or detailed business rationale. It said only that the exchange was reassessing its approach. Claims that low volume definitively caused the decision went beyond the explanation contained in the primary notice, even though trading activity was an important part of the surrounding market discussion.
The development also illustrated a basic feature of derivatives competition: liquidity can reinforce itself. Market participants generally prefer contracts with deeper order books and greater participation, making it difficult for a smaller competing contract to attract new activity. Cboe did not expressly identify that dynamic as its reason on March 14, so it remains interpretation rather than a verified company conclusion.
What the notice did not establish
The product update did not say that institutional interest in bitcoin had ended. It did not change bitcoin’s protocol, determine the asset’s legal classification or resolve pending questions about exchange-traded funds. It also supplied no reliable basis for attributing a same-day bitcoin price movement to the announcement.
The strict event-date conclusion is narrower: Cboe stopped expanding its XBT maturity schedule while leaving existing contracts available and preserving the possibility of a revised digital-asset derivatives strategy.
Later documentary context
In an October 16, 2019 order, the Securities and Exchange Commission described Cboe Futures Exchange as having ceased offering new bitcoin futures contracts as of March 2019 and cited the March 14 product update. That later regulatory description corroborates the event but does not change the provisional wording available on March 14, 2019.
The complete source packet and revision history are retained with the newsroom record.
Automated systems may have assisted with source organization and drafting. Coinburn is accountable for the published text and maintains a revision record.
This article provides news and analysis, not investment, legal or tax advice. Digital assets are volatile and may result in total loss.

