Coincheck announced on May 18, 2018, that it would end support for Monero, Zcash, Dash and Augur’s REP token on June 18, 2018. The decision put a firm deadline on an issue that had become central to Japan’s supervision of cryptocurrency exchanges: whether an operator could adequately evaluate and control the risks associated with every asset it listed.
The announcement did not amount to a nationwide prohibition on the four assets. It was an exchange-level decision made while Coincheck was attempting to strengthen its controls and secure registration under Japan’s cryptocurrency-exchange regime. Its importance lay in what it demonstrated about the direction of travel: token availability on a major trading venue was becoming conditional on compliance and risk-management judgments, not only customer demand.
What Coincheck planned to do
Coincheck said customers could withdraw the affected assets before support ended. Any XMR, ZEC, DASH or REP remaining after the June 18 cutoff could be sold by the company at market prices, at a time and through a method Coincheck considered appropriate, with the resulting yen credited to the customer’s Coincheck balance.
That arrangement created practical uncertainty for customers. The May 18 notice established the assets, deadline and intended treatment of residual balances, but it did not guarantee an individual execution price or a single market-wide valuation. Cryptocurrency trading occurred continuously across venues, and the conversion terms gave Coincheck discretion over timing and execution.
Monero, Zcash and Dash were commonly grouped together because their protocols or optional features could make transaction tracing more difficult than on transparent ledgers. REP was different: it was the participation and reporting token for the Augur prediction-market protocol, not a privacy coin in the same technical sense. Coincheck nevertheless included REP in the broader asset-risk review and cited concerns about the characteristics and uses of the currencies it handled.
Japan’s supervisory backdrop
The decision followed intensive scrutiny of Coincheck after the January 26, 2018 theft of customer NEM. On March 8, 2018, Japan’s Financial Services Agency said an inspection had identified serious problems in Coincheck’s management and internal-control systems, prompting the Kanto Local Finance Bureau to issue a business-improvement order under the Payment Services Act.
Coincheck was then operating as a transitional, or “deemed,” exchange while its registration application remained under review. Japan had introduced exchange registration in April 2017, combining customer-protection requirements with obligations related to identity checks, transaction records and controls against money laundering and terrorist financing.
Minutes from an FSA study-group meeting held on April 27, 2018, described a broader weakness found among inspected operators: some exchanges had not appropriately evaluated the risks embedded in the virtual currencies they offered. The regulator used highly anonymous currencies as an example, noting that their susceptibility to money-laundering use required corresponding internal controls.
That record supports a narrower conclusion than claims that the FSA directly banned named privacy coins. The surviving documents show supervisory pressure around asset assessment and anti-money-laundering controls, while Coincheck publicly presented the four-asset removal as its own risk-based decision.
Why the decision mattered
Coincheck’s move showed how regulation could reshape cryptocurrency markets without changing a protocol or outlawing possession. An exchange deciding that an asset no longer fit its compliance framework could remove a major route between that asset and the yen, impose conversion costs on customers and encourage other operators to revisit their listings.
It also exposed a durable tension. Privacy features can serve legitimate confidentiality interests, but they complicate the transaction monitoring expected of regulated intermediaries. Prediction-market tokens raise a different set of questions about permitted uses and platform governance. Coincheck’s decision grouped those distinct concerns under one operational response: stop handling assets whose risks the company was not prepared to manage.
Later verification
Coincheck’s surviving historical closing-price interface records June 18, 2018, as the final supported date for XMR, REP, ZEC and DASH. That later-maintained company record confirms implementation of the announced cutoff; it does not establish customers’ individual conversion prices or prove that every withdrawal was completed by the deadline.
The complete source packet and revision history are retained with the newsroom record.
Automated systems may have assisted with source organization and drafting. Coinburn is accountable for the published text and maintains a revision record.
This article provides news and analysis, not investment, legal or tax advice. Digital assets are volatile and may result in total loss.

