Core Scientific announced on July 28, 2026 that AMD would anchor a large expansion of its artificial-intelligence data-center business, marking another decisive step away from the company’s origins as a major bitcoin miner.

The companies described a partnership under which Core Scientific would provide infrastructure for deployments using AMD Instinct graphics processors, EPYC processors and ROCm software. Their announcement emphasized potential capacity of up to 2.5 gigawatts. Core Scientific’s same-day regulatory filing showed that the immediately executed arrangements were narrower and more precisely defined: leases represented approximately 529 megawatts of critical information-technology capacity across five sites.

That distinction mattered. The 2.5-gigawatt figure was an expansion ceiling tied partly to future reservation rights, not capacity already delivered or operating on July 28.

What the contracts covered

Core Scientific’s Form 8-K said it entered the leases on July 27, 2026, one day before their public announcement. AMD directly leased an aggregate 377 megawatts at sites in Pecos and Hunt County, Texas, and Muskogee, Oklahoma. A company described only as a “Neocloud” leased another 152 megawatts at Auburn, Alabama, and the third phase of Core Scientific’s Dalton, Georgia, site.

Adding those disclosed components produces 529 megawatts. Core Scientific rounded that commitment to approximately 530 megawatts in its earnings materials. Each lease carried a 15-year term and three optional five-year extensions.

AMD also received a capacity-reservation right covering an additional 1,925 megawatts under specified conditions through December 28, 2028. Adding that reservation to the executed 529 megawatts yields 2,454 megawatts, explaining the companies’ rounded “up to 2.5 gigawatts” description. The filing did not establish that AMD would exercise the entire reservation, that all contemplated construction would be completed, or that all capacity would become billable.

Equity made AMD more than a tenant

The transaction included a warrant allowing AMD to purchase as many as 30 million Core Scientific common shares at $23.47 per share. Core Scientific said that exercise price represented the volume-weighted average price of its Nasdaq-listed common stock during the five trading days preceding execution of the leases.

Warrant shares were scheduled to vest at 12,222 shares for every megawatt of critical IT load contemplated by qualifying leases. Approximately 6.5 million shares vested when the initial agreements were executed. The remaining potential shares therefore depended on additional commercial conditions. The warrant was scheduled to expire on July 27, 2031.

The structure aligned AMD’s potential equity interest with the amount of capacity placed under lease, but it also created possible dilution for Core Scientific shareholders. The filing disclosed the warrant terms; it did not assign a guaranteed value to the instrument or establish that AMD would exercise every vested share.

Why the agreement mattered for crypto infrastructure

Core Scientific’s results for the quarter ended June 30, 2026 showed how far its revenue mix had already moved. The company reported $136.7 million of quarterly colocation revenue, compared with $21.5 million from self-mining digital assets and $6.0 million from hosted mining. Total quarterly revenue was $164.2 million. These are company-reported, unaudited quarterly figures rather than independent market measurements.

The company also said it controlled approximately 2.1 gigawatts of gross utility power and approximately 1.3 gigawatts of leasable customer capacity across 11 data centers as of June 30. It expected hosted mining operations to conclude by December 31, 2026 and said it was winding down self-mining while converting facilities where circumstances allowed.

For the cryptocurrency sector, the significance extended beyond one customer contract. Core Scientific was demonstrating that electrical interconnections, land and cooling systems assembled for proof-of-work mining could be repositioned as scarce infrastructure for AI computing. The July 28 agreement did not prove that every conversion would succeed, but it made the strategic direction—and bitcoin mining’s reduced role in the company’s business—unusually explicit.

Primary sourceCore Scientific Form 8-K filed July 28, 2026

The complete source packet and revision history are retained with the newsroom record.

Automated desk disclosure

Automated systems may have assisted with source organization and drafting. Coinburn is accountable for the published text and maintains a revision record.

Financial-risk note

This article provides news and analysis, not investment, legal or tax advice. Digital assets are volatile and may result in total loss.