President Joe Biden signed the Fiscal Responsibility Act of 2023 on June 3, 2023 without the administration’s proposed excise tax on electricity used for digital-asset mining. Public Law 118-5 raised the federal debt ceiling and set spending-related provisions, but its enacted text contained no digital-asset mining energy tax.
For U.S. miners, the immediate consequence was narrow but material: a potentially large new operating-cost levy had not become law through the debt-ceiling settlement. The omission did not repeal a tax, because the proposal had never been enacted. It also did not prevent the administration or Congress from pursuing a similar measure in later legislation.
What Treasury had proposed
The Treasury Department’s fiscal 2024 Greenbook, released on March 9, 2023, proposed an excise tax equal to 30% of the cost of electricity used by a firm to mine digital assets. It would have applied whether computing equipment was owned or leased. A miner producing or obtaining power off-grid would have owed tax based on the estimated cost of that electricity, rather than escaping the base because it did not buy power from a utility.
Treasury proposed phasing the rate in over three years: 10% for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2023, 20% in the second year and 30% thereafter. The proposal also contemplated reporting the amount and type of electricity used. Treasury argued that mining’s energy demand could create environmental costs, raise local power prices and introduce uncertainty for utilities and communities.
Those provisions were an administration budget proposal, not self-executing tax law. Congress would have needed to enact statutory language. That distinction became decisive on June 3.
What the signed law did—and did not do
The Government Publishing Office records June 3, 2023 as the approval date for Public Law 118-5. The House had passed the measure on May 31 and the Senate on June 1. The law addressed the debt limit, discretionary spending, rescissions, permitting and other negotiated subjects. The enrolled text contained no digital-asset mining energy tax.
Contemporaneous crypto reporting had already identified that omission while the bill moved through Congress. On May 29, Representative Warren Davidson characterized blocking proposed taxes as one of the agreement’s victories after a mining-industry researcher asked about the proposal. That was a lawmaker’s political description of the bargain, not legislative text establishing that the proposal was permanently abandoned.
The safest event-day conclusion is therefore limited: the June 3 law did not create the Treasury-proposed mining tax. Statements that the tax was “dead” went beyond what the signed statute could prove. The administration’s Greenbook remained evidence of policy preference, while Public Law 118-5 showed only what survived this particular negotiation.
Why the omission mattered
Electricity is a central variable in proof-of-work mining economics. A tax calculated as a percentage of power cost would have affected miners differently according to their electricity contracts, generation arrangements, equipment efficiency and ability to relocate. Because the proposed base included estimated off-grid power costs, it was designed to reach vertically integrated operations as well as utility customers.
The June 3 outcome reduced near-term federal tax uncertainty around that specific proposal. It did not establish that U.S. mining faced no federal, state or local obligations, and it did not validate competing claims about mining’s environmental benefits or harms.
No event-day market-price inference is warranted. Crypto trades continuously across venues, and the surviving sources do not isolate the law’s effect from broader debt-ceiling relief, monetary expectations or ordinary weekend trading. The institutional development was the enacted omission itself: a prominent administration crypto-tax proposal failed to enter the statute that resolved the debt-limit confrontation.
The complete source packet and revision history are retained with the newsroom record.
Automated systems may have assisted with source organization and drafting. Coinburn is accountable for the published text and maintains a revision record.
This article provides news and analysis, not investment, legal or tax advice. Digital assets are volatile and may result in total loss.

