CoinMarketCap’s historical snapshot for March 28, 2026 placed ether at $1,992.69, leaving the second-largest cryptocurrency below $2,000 after it crossed that threshold during the preceding session. The provider reported that ETH was nearly unchanged over its rolling 24-hour window, up 0.07%, but remained down 4.04% over seven days.

That distinction is central to the event-day record. March 28 was not another large daily collapse in the cited dataset. It was the first full dated snapshot showing ether remaining below $2,000 after the sharper March 27 decline reported contemporaneously. The market had stabilized for the moment without recovering the lost threshold.

The snapshot showed broad weekly weakness

CoinMarketCap recorded an ether market capitalization of $240.501 billion, a reported circulating supply of 120,691,470 ETH and estimated 24-hour volume of $8.641 billion. Multiplying the displayed price by the reported supply produces approximately $240.501 billion, consistent with the published capitalization after allowing for rounded inputs.

Those figures were provider estimates rather than audited totals. Ether trades continuously across many exchanges, and CoinMarketCap’s historical page does not state an exact intraday cutoff, provide venue-level weights or identify how much reported volume was excluded by its quality controls. Its 24-hour and seven-day changes are rolling windows attached to the snapshot, not returns between regulated market closes.

Bitcoin offered a useful comparison. The same snapshot placed BTC at $66,319.70, down 0.03% over 24 hours and 3.48% over seven days. Ether therefore underperformed bitcoin by 0.56 percentage points over the provider’s seven-day windows. Solana was weaker still, down 6.23% for the week, while XRP declined 5.25%. TRON, up 1.53%, showed that the retreat was broad but not universal.

The comparison supports describing a risk-off crypto market, but it does not establish that every asset moved for the same reason or that ether’s protocol fundamentals deteriorated on March 28.

The decisive move occurred on March 27

A contemporaneous March 28 report said ether had slipped below $2,000 on March 27 and attributed the break to a roughly 5% 24-hour decline. Its precise percentage differs from CoinMarketCap’s March 28 snapshot because the reports used different observation times and windows. The dated CoinMarketCap series presented by a separate historical-data service lists March 27 opening near $2,059.45 and ending near $1,991.27, a decline of approximately 3.31% across that provider-defined day.

The safer conclusion is therefore limited: ether broke below $2,000 during March 27 and was still quoted below it in the March 28 historical snapshot. Claims about the exact percentage of the break depend on the venue, cutoff and calculation method.

Broader markets were already under pressure. Reporting published on March 27 described bitcoin and other risk assets weakening amid the continuing Iran war, rising oil prices and reduced expectations for central-bank rate cuts. Approximately $14 billion of bitcoin options were also scheduled to expire on Deribit that Friday. Those conditions provide contemporaneous context, but they do not prove that any one factor caused ether’s decline. Establishing causation would require timestamped order-flow, derivatives-positioning and cross-market liquidity data.

What March 28 established

The consequential March 28 signal was persistence rather than acceleration. Ether remained below a prominent round-number threshold, carried a larger seven-day loss than bitcoin and represented about $240.5 billion in estimated market value, even as its latest rolling 24-hour change was close to zero.

The evidence does not show that $2,000 had become permanent resistance, that sellers were exhausted or that the decline predicted subsequent returns. It records a market state during a defined historical snapshot. Later price behavior cannot determine what the March 28 data meant to participants at the time.

Primary sourceCoinMarketCap — Historical Snapshot for March 28, 2026

The complete source packet and revision history are retained with the newsroom record.

Automated desk disclosure

Automated systems may have assisted with source organization and drafting. Coinburn is accountable for the published text and maintains a revision record.

Financial-risk note

This article provides news and analysis, not investment, legal or tax advice. Digital assets are volatile and may result in total loss.