India’s cryptocurrency market absorbed a sharp, locally concentrated selloff on November 24, 2021 after the Lok Sabha published a tentative legislative agenda containing the Cryptocurrency and Regulation of Official Digital Currency Bill, 2021. The official entry said the planned measure would facilitate a Reserve Bank of India digital currency, seek to prohibit “private cryptocurrencies” and permit certain exceptions for cryptocurrency technology and its uses.
That terse description was enough to disrupt rupee-denominated trading. It was not, however, enacted law or even a published bill. The November 23 parliamentary bulletin listed the proposal among 26 new bills expected during the winter session of the Seventeenth Lok Sabha. It did not define “private cryptocurrencies,” identify covered assets, specify penalties or establish that Parliament would approve the proposal.
A selloff centered on Indian venues
Contemporaneous reports indicate that the most severe dislocation occurred on Indian exchanges rather than across the global market. At approximately 2:25 a.m. Eastern time on November 24, The Block recorded bitcoin at about 4.09 million rupees on WazirX, equivalent in its report to roughly $54,900, while bitcoin traded near $56,750 on Binance. Comparing those two reported snapshots produces a discount of approximately 3.3% for the WazirX price.
The comparison is indicative, not a consolidated market measure. It juxtaposes different venues and trading pairs, depends on the report’s rupee-dollar conversion and captures only one moment in a continuously traded market. The Block reported that discounts had exceeded 15% on some Indian venues earlier in the episode, but surviving public records do not provide a complete tick-by-tick dataset for independently reproducing that claim.
Reuters separately reported on November 24 that the rupee price of tether, the dollar-linked USDT token, fell 25% to nearly 60 rupees. That figure was attributed to investor Naimish Sanghvi rather than to an exchange-issued daily close. Reuters also cited traders and investors describing heavy selling as market participants attempted to exit positions after the agenda appeared.
WazirX founder Nischal Shetty told Moneycontrol on November 24 that major cryptocurrency prices had fallen roughly 10% to 15% overnight in India and characterized the activity as panic selling. His account is relevant because WazirX was one of the affected venues, but it remains an executive’s contemporaneous description rather than independently audited market data.
The document said less than the market assumed
The distinction between a tentative agenda and legislation mattered. On November 24, no public bill text established which decentralized assets, privacy-focused tokens, exchanges, custody arrangements or uses would fall within the proposed prohibition. The phrase “private cryptocurrencies” therefore could not reliably be mapped onto bitcoin, ether, USDT or any other instrument from the bulletin alone.
The price gap nonetheless showed how regulatory uncertainty could fragment a nominally global market. Crypto assets traded continuously across borders, but access to banking rails, local currency liquidity and expectations about domestic law remained jurisdiction-specific. A bitcoin price on an Indian rupee venue could consequently diverge from a dollar market even when the underlying asset was transferable between platforms.
What was knowable on November 24
The verified record establishes that India’s government placed a cryptocurrency proposal on its tentative winter-session agenda and that Indian trading venues experienced unusually steep discounts during the resulting uncertainty. It does not establish that a ban had become law, that the unpublished bill covered every cryptocurrency, or that the reported lows represented uniform prices across India. Those questions remained unresolved on November 24, 2021.
The complete source packet and revision history are retained with the newsroom record.
Automated systems may have assisted with source organization and drafting. Coinburn is accountable for the published text and maintains a revision record.
This article provides news and analysis, not investment, legal or tax advice. Digital assets are volatile and may result in total loss.

