The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on June 29, 2022 disapproved NYSE Arca’s proposed rule change to list and trade shares of Grayscale Bitcoin Trust, closing the administrative path for converting the existing trust into a spot bitcoin exchange-traded product. Grayscale Investments responded on June 29 by filing a petition for review in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.
The paired actions mattered beyond one fund. The SEC’s order preserved a regulatory divide under which exchange-traded products holding bitcoin futures had reached U.S. national securities exchanges, while proposals holding bitcoin directly continued to be rejected. Grayscale’s immediate challenge moved that divide from agency proceedings into federal court.
What the SEC rejected
NYSE Arca filed the proposal, designated SR-NYSEArca-2021-90, on October 19, 2021. The SEC published it for public comment on November 8, 2021 and later instituted proceedings to determine whether to approve or disapprove it. Release No. 34-95180, issued June 29, 2022, concluded that the exchange had not carried its burden under Section 6(b)(5) of the Securities Exchange Act.
That provision requires exchange rules to be designed, among other things, to prevent fraudulent and manipulative practices and protect investors and the public interest. The SEC said NYSE Arca had not shown that alternative safeguards could replace a comprehensive surveillance-sharing agreement with a regulated market of significant size related to spot bitcoin. It also found that the record did not establish the Chicago Mercantile Exchange bitcoin-futures market as such a market for the bitcoin that GBTC would hold.
The distinction is important: the order did not declare bitcoin valueless, prohibit ownership of GBTC or make a general judgment about whether spot bitcoin was a suitable investment. It rejected the exchange’s evidentiary showing under the statutory standard governing the proposed listing.
Why conversion mattered
GBTC already represented proportional interests in bitcoin held by the trust, but its shares traded over the counter rather than on a national securities exchange. The SEC order recorded Grayscale’s position that GBTC could not operate an ongoing creation-and-redemption program in its existing form. Without that mechanism, arbitrage could not reliably keep the share price aligned with the value of the trust’s bitcoin holdings.
The proposed exchange-traded structure would have permitted basket creations and redemptions through authorized participants. Grayscale argued that this mechanism could improve tracking of net asset value and reduce premiums or discounts. Those benefits were assertions advanced by the sponsor and commenters, not findings adopted by the SEC. The Commission concluded that claimed investor benefits did not excuse failure to satisfy every applicable Exchange Act requirement.
No bitcoin or GBTC price, return or discount calculation is used here because the primary event records do not provide a consistent June 29 market-data snapshot with a common timestamp and methodology.
The dispute moves to court
Grayscale announced that its petition challenged the denial under the Administrative Procedure Act and the Securities Exchange Act. The proceeding was docketed as Grayscale Investments, LLC v. SEC, No. 22-1142, with a June 29, 2022 filing date. Filing the petition established the company’s legal position; it did not determine that the SEC had acted unlawfully or guarantee that conversion would occur.
As of June 29, the verified development was therefore both regulatory and institutional: a major bitcoin investment vehicle remained outside the proposed exchange-traded structure, while the sponsor opened a direct judicial test of the SEC’s differing treatment of spot and futures-based bitcoin products.
Later context
On August 29, 2023, the D.C. Circuit granted Grayscale’s petition and vacated the SEC order, finding that the agency had not adequately explained its different treatment of similar products. On January 10, 2024, the SEC approved multiple spot bitcoin exchange-traded product listings. These later outcomes explain the dispute’s significance but were not knowable on June 29, 2022.
The complete source packet and revision history are retained with the newsroom record.
Automated systems may have assisted with source organization and drafting. Coinburn is accountable for the published text and maintains a revision record.
This article provides news and analysis, not investment, legal or tax advice. Digital assets are volatile and may result in total loss.

