Donald Trump put cryptocurrency policy into his presidential campaign platform on May 25, 2024, promising to protect self-custody, oppose a United States central bank digital currency and keep crypto businesses from being pushed overseas.
Speaking at the Libertarian National Convention in Washington, the former president and Republican presidential candidate also promised to commute Silk Road founder Ross Ulbricht’s prison sentence to time served if elected. The commitments were campaign promises, not enacted policy, but they marked an unusually explicit appeal to cryptocurrency owners in a national election.
What Trump promised
The direct transcript records Trump saying that the future of crypto and Bitcoin should be “made in the USA.” He pledged support for the right to self-custody and opposition to the creation of a central bank digital currency. He supplied no proposed legislation, regulatory text, agency instructions or implementation timetable for those positions.
Trump described the country as having 50 million crypto holders. That figure was his own contemporaneous claim; the speech did not identify a dataset, survey date, definition of ownership or methodology. It should therefore be treated as political messaging rather than a verified measure of active wallets, investors or voters.
Self-custody refers to users controlling the credentials needed to transfer their own digital assets instead of leaving those credentials with an exchange or another intermediary. The pledge addressed a central ideological and regulatory concern for Bitcoin users, but it did not define how federal rules governing financial intermediaries, sanctions, taxation or illicit finance would change.
Trump’s Ulbricht commitment was more specific. He said he would commute the sentence to time served on his first day back in office. A 2015 Justice Department record establishes that Ulbricht received a life sentence after convictions connected to creating and operating Silk Road, where Bitcoin facilitated payments. On May 25, the statement remained conditional on Trump winning the election and exercising presidential clemency authority.
Crypto had entered an institutional week
The speech followed two major federal developments. On May 22, the House of Representatives passed the Financial Innovation and Technology for the 21st Century Act by 279 votes to 136. The bill proposed a market-structure framework dividing responsibilities between the Securities and Exchange Commission and Commodity Futures Trading Commission, but House passage did not make it law.
On May 23, the SEC approved exchange rule changes covering eight proposed spot ether exchange-traded products. The order expressly stated that shares could not begin trading until the corresponding registration statements became effective. The decision nevertheless expanded the institutional context in which presidential candidates were addressing digital assets.
Those developments made Trump’s May 25 remarks more than a general technology endorsement. Congress was debating jurisdiction, the SEC had opened a route for another class of spot crypto investment products, and a leading presidential candidate was seeking votes with positions on custody and digital money.
Promises were not policy
The anti-CBDC pledge also exceeded the immediate controversy. Federal Reserve materials available before the speech said the central bank had made no decision to issue a CBDC and would proceed only with an authorizing law. Trump was therefore opposing a potential future policy, not reversing an operational digital-dollar program on May 25.
Likewise, the promise to keep crypto activity in the United States offered no test for which businesses, tokens or activities would qualify. It did not resolve whether particular assets were securities or commodities, alter an enforcement case, authorize an exchange or protect an identified wallet product.
The verified event-day conclusion is narrower: Trump assembled self-custody, opposition to a CBDC, domestic crypto development and Ulbricht clemency into one electoral appeal. The speech demonstrated that digital-asset policy had become a presidential campaign issue. It did not establish that any of the promised outcomes would occur, and no cryptocurrency price movement can be attributed to the remarks from the reviewed record.
The complete source packet and revision history are retained with the newsroom record.
Automated systems may have assisted with source organization and drafting. Coinburn is accountable for the published text and maintains a revision record.
This article provides news and analysis, not investment, legal or tax advice. Digital assets are volatile and may result in total loss.